Message to Facebook: Relevant does not equal Engaging

As Facebook works feverishly this year to hammer out its business model, it should consider that the three most profitable online media companies in the U.S. (Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!) all rely on advertising revenue for their businesses. Moreover, advertising has furnished a reliable business model for every electronic medium in U.S. history and there is no reason to think that online social networking platforms will be the exception. With this in mind, Facebook should look into different ways to enable advertisers to place rich, engaging content on the site that users could share with their friends. Allowing brands to place shareable rich content on the site could also play into the -Pay With Facebook Icon-company’s recently launched virtual currency program (“Facebook Credits”). The company could permit advertisers to “sponsor” Facebook Credits of users who share the sponsor’s ads with their friends. In this way, the company could generate revenues from both advertising and its virtual currency while more effectively monetizing the myriad of social interactions that occur between users on the site.

Currently, Facebook allows only site-served ads and a strictly limited set of formats. Facebook’s rationale behind its decision to limit the creativity of advertisers in this way is that it ensures a sleeker user experience. Moreover, the company clearly believes that the enhanced relevancy of the ads (since they’re served by the site which has access to all user profile data) will make them engaging despite their rudimentary content. However, relevant does not equal engaging. People share content because it’s entertaining. Conversely, people will often fail to notice boring content, even if it’s ‘relevant.’ The narrow range of creative formats Facebook offers allows little room for truly rich engaging user experiences. Thus, in its effort to create less intrusion, Facebook has in fact enabled the placement of boring content that actually clutters the user experience – despite the fact that it’s targeted for relevancy.

In conclusion, as it searches for a profitable business model, Facebook should proceed as follows. First of all, it should look to emulating profitable online media companies in the U.S. market. Second, it should remember that relevant does not equal engaging and users will ignore even the most targeted ads if they’re not entertaining. I have suggested one strategy the company could use to monetize content sharing by allowing advertisers to place rich engaging ads on the site that users could, by sharing the content, use to earn Facebook Credits sponsored by advertisers. However this is just one approach among many other, equally valid, and equal in quantity to the myriad of ways that users interact on Facebook.



Sean Gelles, Manager, Product Planning

Comments   Add a comment

  1. nextbrett | March 16th, 2010

    Interesting take on it Sean.
    I guess the problem at the moment is that targeting doesn’t = relevance.

    It’s really up to the advertiser to get it right. I’ve seen some pretty boring campaigns really work.. not cause they were necessarily engaging but because they were relevant and done right.

    Another thing to consider is the impact of bringing commercial involvement closer to users. At the moment, it’s easy to ignore ads and page suggestions… but would integrated offerings augment or diminish users perception of facebook? Again it would probably come down to the implementation.

  2. Eyeblaster Editor | March 17th, 2010

    “Thanks for your feedback Brett. You make an excellent point about relevancy superseding engagement. We can see this readily in the case of search campaigns. But I think that, on a site like Facebook, engagement is really key and may even trump relevancy. Unlike with search, users on Facebook are deeply focused on their social interactions so it will really take some engaging creative to grab their attention (of course the strangely mis-targeted ads that the site serves sometimes, and which have been getting a lot of press lately, will get their attention too although not in the desired way!). That’s why advertisers need rich ads. The trick for Facebook is to allow rich ads while continuing to empower users to control their experience. I have some ideas on ways to implement this and would love to discuss sometime.”
    Sean Gelles

Leave a Reply